From childhood, we’ve been conditioned to challenge rules with “what if” scenarios, seeking exceptions to every directive. Whether in church, home, or life, this curiosity leads to a common principle: every rule has exceptions. But exceptions, while necessary, should not undermine the rule itself.
Take, for instance, a hypothetical law: “Every male above 21 must be able to drive.” While seemingly reasonable, it neglects individuals who lack access, face physical disabilities, or have other valid constraints. Exceptions must exist, but the law’s spirit—to encourage driving proficiency—remains central. Elevating exceptions above the rule creates ambiguity, weakens enforcement, and often shifts focus from the law’s intent to debates over inclusion.
This issue transcends laws, extending to life principles and values in areas like Christianity, marriage, or family. Exceptions arise to address unique circumstances but must never dismantle the foundation or confuse those who uphold the standard.
Media also plays a role, highlighting unique cases that evoke sympathy and challenge the rule. However, no law can perfectly accommodate every situation, and exceptions must coexist with the broader principle.
The essence lies in understanding the spirit behind rules. While exceptions provide necessary flexibility, they do not negate the rule’s purpose. In life and law, the challenge is to balance compassion for exceptions with respect for the standard. Ultimately, the foundation must remain unshaken, grounded in love and a commitment to do no harm.
Ibukunoluwa Oluwatoni Pitan.
Nigerian Law School Abuja campus.
+23408098250062
